Monday, May 20, 2013

Star Trek Into Darkness

Title: Star Trek Into Darkness

Year: 2013

Director: J.J. Abrams

Rating: PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi action and violence


Synopsis: After the crew of the Enterprise find an unstoppable force of terror from within their own organization, Captain Kirk leads a manhunt to a war-zone world to capture a one man weapon of mass destruction.

Official Page and IMDb Page

Official Trailer





STEPH SAID

Rating:


Review:
*This review contains spoilers*


Half of this movie didn’t make sense; the other half is directed to fans of the original series. On the other hand, it is visually appealing and intriguing at times.

This movie’s plot is intriguing and confusing at the same time; it has so many layers and storylines that neither is explored in depth. The two antagonists of the story, Khan and The Admiral, have different roles that keep changing constantly, from bad guy to good guy to bad guy again. That alone left me baffled. But the fact that I didn’t know who The Admiral was made it even worse. He didn’t have an introduction like Scotty or Sulu, the actors just began talking about him like everybody knew who he was. Well, I didn’t know and was lost for half the movie.

Also, Khan’s background story is confusing and full of holes. For example, exactly how and where did The Admiral find Khan? How did The Admiral knew what Khan was? Did Khan make the terrorist attempt because he wanted to kill The Admiral or because he was following with the plan to start a war? Did Khan left for Kronos because he didn’t want to be found or because he wanted to start the war? Among others.

Some scenes of the movie felt forced and, I think, were only filmed to please the fans of the original series. A flash appearance by Leonard Nimoy and the Klingons, for example. More than once the Enterprise was showed coming out, of water or clouds, in a grandiose manner. I know I was supposed to feel impressed, but I wasn’t, to me it’s just a ship. Yet, I guess fans of the classic series were revering those moments. Oh and the fact that it was a retelling of Khan’s story is probably a nod to the fans.

Most of the movie was clichéd and predictable, the only exception being the true intentions of Khan and The Admiral. I’ll name a few as proof. There is a time where Mr. Spock is going to die and another one in which Kirk is dying. However it is obvious they will not, since they are the protagonists of a recently rebooted famous series. Similarly, there was a time a ship was going to fire against the Enterprise and it lost its power at the opportune moment. Also there was a moment in which Bones’ arm gets stuck in a bomb, which is deactivated with two seconds of the timer.

If this movie had something good was its visually appealing images and effects, and its actors’ performances. Anton Yelchin and Karl Urban were great, I really enjoyed their performances. But it was Zachary Quinto and Benedict Cumberbatch who kept the movie going. I love how Quinto portrays Spock; he never ceases to amaze me. I love how he can act like he is strong and has no emotion while at the same time letting it all out. When Spock was emotional due to the loss of his friend he became irrational, and I loved it! Cumberbatch performance was exceptional. Five stars to him alone. He was intense, dramatic, intriguing, emotive and constant. If it not were for his and Quinto’s performance I would have been bored throughout the whole movie.

I think J.J. Abrams tried too much with this movie, tried to please too many people and the movie got out of hand. The actor’s performance was what saved it.

0 comments:

Share your thoughts...